AI-Augmented Graph Databases for Judicial Case Management: A Scalable AWS-Powered Framework for Relationship Analysis and Decision Support
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63397/ISCSITR-IJSRAIML_06_02_006Keywords:
AWS, Judicial, Graph Database, AIAbstract
The objective of this study is to modernise court case management through an AI aided graph database that operates in AWS technologies. Amazon Neptune organises intricate legal connections, while SageMaker and Comprehend make it possible to expose predictive insights and information extraction through NLP. GNNs ease the finding of hidden patterns in an easier way, all to speed up the processing and increase the decision accuracy. The query latency is less than 200 ms with AI enhanced query performance. It is also architected based on privacy and security using AI. Data extraction time is 30% quicker and the operation cost is slashed by 25%. However, it shows how ethics and acting at scale in the judicial system can be integrated through the use of AI.
References
Zhou, J., Chen, X., Zhang, H., & Li, Z. (2024). Automatic Knowledge graph construction for judicial cases. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2404.09416
Khatri, M., Yusuf, M., Kumar, Y., Shah, R. R., & Kumaraguru, P. (2023). Exploring Graph neural networks for Indian legal judgment prediction. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2310.12800
Mittal, V., Gangodkar, D., & Pant, B. (2022). An efficient approach for storage of court judgements using graph database. International Journal of Advanced Intelligence Paradigms, 22(1/2), 214. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijaip.2022.123024
Lubega, J. B. (2021). Court Case Management System. Journal of Innovative Technologies and Business For Sustainable Development, 3. https://slaujournals.com/itbsd/article/view/22
Shi, J., Xu, L., Huang, C., Zha, X., & Liu, J. (2024, December). Research on an AI-based Smart Management Information System for Enterprise Judicial Cases: A Case Study of Power Grid Enterprises. In 5th International Conference on Economic Management and Big Data Application (ICEMBDA 2024) (pp. 322-333). Atlantis Press. 10.2991/978-94-6463-638-3_33
Barman, R. (2023). Unveiling the Future: The Intersection of Artificial Intelligence and the Judicial System. Indian J. Integrated Rsch. L., 3, 1. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/injloitd4&i=2952
de Oliveira, R. S., Reis Jr, A. S., & Sperandio Nascimento, E. G. (2022). Predicting the number of days in court cases using artificial intelligence. PloS one, 17(5), e0269008. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269008
Javed, K., & Li, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence in judicial adjudication: Semantic biasness classification and identification in legal judgement (SBCILJ). Heliyon, 10(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30184
Sheetal, S., Veda, N., Pruthv, P., & Mamatha, H. R. R. (2022, December). Knowledge graph-based thematic similarity for indian legal judgement documents using rhetorical roles. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Natural Language Processing (ICON) (pp. 154-160). https://aclanthology.org/2022.icon-main.21/
Zhu, G., Hao, M., Zheng, C., & Wang, L. (2022). Design of knowledge graph retrieval system for legal and regulatory framework of multilevel latent semantic indexing. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022(1), 6781043. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6781043
