Canonical Payment Data Models for Merchant Acquiring: Merchants, Terminals, Transactions, Fees, and Chargebacks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63397/ISCSITR-IJCSE_03_01_006Keywords:
Merchant master, terminal lifecycle, authorization, settlement, fees, interchange, conformed dimensions, ISO 8583, ISO 20022Abstract
This paper presents a canonical payment data model that unifies merchant master records, terminal lifecycle management, transactional events (authorization, presentment/clearing, settlement), fee and interchange rating, and end-to-end chargeback workflows for merchant acquirers. Its design follows event sourcing with conformed dimensions and effective-dated reference data using disciplined Slowly Changing Dimension (SCD) patterns Type 0 to represent stable identities, Type 1 to represent clerical corrections, and Type 2 to represent historized and time-varying attributes to ensure that all acquirers and schemes maintain point-in-time truth and reconciliation breaks are eliminated. Specify core entities and relationships, give ERDs representing terminal state transitions, transaction hops and dispute episodes, and also contain sample mappings between legacy flat files and ISO 8583/ISO 20022 messages into a core and analytic star schema. Auth presentment settlement chargeback is linked to a lineage blueprint that supports deterministic surrogate keys and rule versioning, achieving every financial result, therefore, explainable and reproducible. Auditable pricing and retrospective re-rating the pricing is supported using effective-dated and interchange tables which have hierarchical applicability (region, scheme, product, MCC, channel, risk). Some of the areas of implementation guidance include a layered lakehouse/warehouse (bronze/silver/gold), streamline authorizations, micro-batch settlement alignment, tokenization with a PCI scope, and data quality contracts. The concepts of faster onboarding by standardized contracts and devices provisioning, improved data quality by conformance gates and SCD stewardship and significantly reduced exceptions by uniform lifecycle semantics and disciplined typology of dispute are measured.
References
Omotayo, K. V., Uzoka, A. C., Okolo, C. H., Olinmah, F. I., & Adanigbo, O. S. (2021). Scalable Merchant Acquisition Model for Payment Platform Penetration across Nigeria’s Informal Commercial Economy.
Rabhi, F. A., Guabtni, A., & Yao, L. (2009). A data model for processing financial market and news data. International Journal of Electronic Finance, 3(4), 387-403.
Bennett, M. (2013). The financial industry business ontology: Best practice for big data. Journal of Banking Regulation, 14(3), 255-268.
Bruggink, D., Karsten, P., & de Meijer, C. (2012). The European cards environment and ISO 20022. Journal of Payments Strategy & Systems, 6(1), 80-99.
Shahrivar, S., Elahi, S., Hassanzadeh, A., & Montazer, G. (2018). A business model for commercial open source software: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 103, 202-214.
2022 Analytics Trends in Financial Services: Are You Ready?, Infotrust, Online. https://infotrust.com/articles/2022-analytics-trends-in-financial-services-are-you-ready/
Sorkin, D. E. (2001). Payment methods for consumer-to-consumer online transactions. Akron L. Rev., 35, 1.
Gollapudi, S. (2015, February). Aggregating financial services data without assumptions: A semantic data reference architecture. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 9th international conference on semantic computing (IEEE ICSC 2015) (pp. 312-315). IEEE.
Thompson, G. (2015). Semantic Models as Knowledge Repositories for Data Modellers in the Financial Industry.
Major, T., & Mangano, J. (2020). Modernising payments messaging: The ISO 20022 standard. 1. 1 Managing the Risks of Holding Self-securitisations as Collateral 2. 11 Government Bond Market Functioning and COVID-19 3. The Economic Effects of Low Interest Rates and Unconventional 21 Monetary Policy 4. Retail Central Bank Digital Currency: Design Considerations, Rationales, 66.
Olson, D. L., Johansson, B., & De Carvalho, R. A. (2018). Open source ERP business model framework. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 50, 30-36.
Syed, S. (2020). Data Lineage Strategies-A Modernized View. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice.
Huff, E., & Lee, J. (2020, July). Data as a strategic asset: Improving results through a systematic data governance framework. In SPE Latin America and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference (p. D031S013R001). SPE.
Card Acquiring Market Review, Stakeholder submissions to consultation CP22/1, PSR, 2022. online. https://www.psr.org.uk/media/40wgxs4u/psr-cp22-1-camr-initial-remedies-consultation-responses-jun-2022.pdf
Evans, D., & Schmalensee, R. (2005). The economics of interchange fees and their regulation: An overview.
Kyte, T. (2014). Architecture Overview. In Expert Oracle Database Architecture: Third Edition (pp. 53-72). Berkeley, CA: Apress.
Yang, X., Liu, W., Liu, W., & Tao, D. (2019). A survey on canonical correlation analysis. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 33(6), 2349-2368.
D'Aniello, G., De Vivo, A., De Rosa, A. C., Donatiello, A., Greco, D., Pettinati, F., ... & Di Santo, G. (2014, September). A Semantic-Based Architecture for Electronic Money System and Multi-channel Value-Added Services. In 2014 International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems (pp. 104-111). IEEE.
Global Merchant Acquiring Market Report 2022: Growth in E-Commerce & Digital Banking Services Driving Sector - ResearchAndMarkets.com, Online. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220804005818/en/Global-Merchant-Acquiring-Market-Report-2022-Growth-in-E-Commerce-Digital-Banking-Services-Driving-Sector---ResearchAndMarkets.com
Wilcox, B. (2006). Time-Constrained Evaluation: A practical approach for LEAs and schools. Routledge.
Almalki, S. (2016). Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Data in Mixed Methods Research--Challenges and Benefits. Journal of education and learning, 5(3), 288-296.
Madey, D. L. (1982). Some benefits of integrating qualitative and quantitative methods in program evaluation, with illustrations. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 4(2), 223-236.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Ravi Kumar Vallemoni (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


